About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

The future of conversation in videogames

Brandon Erickson's picture

Mass Effect

I’ve been thinking recently about how conversations occur within videogames. In many role-playing games (RPGs), players can talk to various non-player characters (NPCs) by walking up to them and clicking on a button to hear what they have to say. In many cases, NPCs will repeat the same thing over and over again no matter how many times the player talks to them. To be honest, it isn’t really a conversation at all. It’s more like information gathering. The player’s onscreen avatar usually doesn’t say anything in most RPGs. Just walk up to an NPC, hit the talk button, and he or she spits out some preprogrammed dialogue.

More recently, games have increased the complexity of these “conversations” by including points where the player can choose between a set of responses, which in turn affects the next thing the NPC will say. For the most part, however, these choices are of little consequence beyond providing a touch of variety to the standard grind of gathering information and exploring. Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion does a good job of extending the basic formula by giving the player a menu of topics to choose from when conversing, but it’s really not fundamentally different from what’s come before.

That’s why the forthcoming Mass Effect has me so intrigued. The game’s conversation system allows players to choose from multiple responses, with the added option of interrupting an NPC with the chosen response or waiting until they are done speaking. This is meant to lend a more dynamic quality to conversations, and judging by the recently published review for Mass Effect in Game Informer, the system works very well in practice. I hope this will pave the way for further innovations in conversation and storytelling. At the very least, this has already got me thinking about what the next wave of advances will look like.

One possibility may be the use of conversational programs. A recent article in the journal Computers in Human Behavior describes a study in which a group of college students chatted with a conversation bot (i.e., a computer program capable of engaging in a conversation). What fascinated me about the study was that the students clearly perceived the program as having human-like qualities. Even though the students knew they were talking to a computer, they actually showed general agreement in their perception of the bots personality traits (e.g., friendliness, thoughtfulness, neuroticism, etc.).

In addition, the researchers were able to manipulate the students’ feelings about the bot by changing whether or not it used the students’ first names and how long it took to respond. On top of that, the researchers found that the length of time that the students spent talking to the bot was inversely correlated to how neurotic they though it was. So it seems that not only do people dislike talking to neurotic humans, but they also dislike talking to neurotic computers. In a sense, this isn’t surprising. But it is surprising to me that a computer program could actually come across as possessing a recognizable personality.

So what does this have to do with videogames? For one thing, it suggests interesting possibilities for how players could interact with NPCs. Most RPGs are filled with random incidental characters, many of whom have no connection to the main plot. I think it would be fascinating if certain secondary characters in a videogame actually behaved like conversation bots. (For this to work, it would obviously be necessary for the player to use a keyboard.) Of course, there are all sorts of problems this would present from a design perspective. I’m not sure how it would be possible to have well written dialogue in a game if the player is partially responsible for creating it.

The real issue, as I see it, is figuring out how a conversational program could be meaningfully incorporated into a game, rather than just being used in some throwaway manner. If players can say or ask anything they want, then how could the conversation program react in a way that is meaningful and consistent with the game world? It’s an unrealistic expectation to hope that the player would only say or ask things that make sense given the context. Players would inevitably say things to the computer that are anachronistic, nonsensical, or just plain silly. This is not to say it could never work, but the issue of player unpredictability would have to be dealt with.

The notion of having a conversational program in a videogame may be a little far-fetched, but then again a game like Grand Theft Auto would have seemed pretty far-fetched 20 years ago. There's ultimately no way of knowing for sure what kinds of technologies will find their way into the future of interactive entertainment. For now, I am very much looking forward to checking out Mass Effect for myself and experiencing its unique conversation system firsthand.

Category Tags
Articles: Editorials  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You might want to try out

You might want to try out Douglas Adams' adventure game Starship Titanic, which uses chatbots for its NPCs. Or for something more sophisticated (and free), try the short experiment Façade. At least, I've heard it's sophisticated- my computer can't run it.

Anyway, the trouble with chatbots is they're not practical. You can program one to recognize, based on sentence structure and key words, what sort of response is appropriate. But then you still need to manually write in that response, every single time. What people tend to not understand about chatbots is that everything they say is prerecorded. So they're not nearly as impressive as they seem to be. You can't program a chatbot once and then use it in lots of situations- it's hardwired to react appropriately to one situation and only one situation. So if you want an entire game filled with these, then every single distinct conversation needs totally different programming.

When people see a chatbot, their imaginations tend to light up. "Wow, in a few years we'll have computers with real personalities interacting with us, just like on TV!" But it doesn't work like that. Modern AI routines aren't human-like programs, they're programs whose responses are human-like. This may seem like a small distinction, but it's not. Each program is designed for one specific task, and superficially seems to behave like a human as long as it's only doing that one specific task. This is because every possible thing it might have to do there is anticipated and accounted for by the programmer.

In order to have a more all-purpose artificial personality, of the sort that could be dropped into a large story and expected to fit in, it would need to use a neural network modeled after the human brain (to some limited degree). To the best of my knowledge, no such program has been designed. I think there's been some effort to mimic the brain of simple creatures like insects, but to even attempt the imitation of a human would take at least decades of research into how the brain works. Theoretically, such a program should be possible. You could (still theoretically) have a generic AI routine which would be literally trained to act a role convincingly with improvisation as it is called for. (The training would not necessarily be practical in itself, of course.) But there's no short-term money there, so I don't expect we'll see such a thing for a very long time.

In short: don't get your hopes up. Façade only works because it's so short and limited. You won't find this sort of thing in RPGs.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.