About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Call of Duty: Black Ops Review

Richard Naik's picture

Mcnamara? Really? You Couldn't Throw Eisenhower or Truman in There?

Call of Duty: Black Ops Screenshot

HIGH: JFK spouting off one-liners while blasting zombies in the face.

LOW: The complete and total incompetence of my squadmates.

WTF: Why does the guy I'm torturing suddenly turn around and help me when the bad guys show up?

I have a notebook that I scribble notes in when I'm playing a game for a review. The subject of the notes can range from something important about the game to some witty saying that I just have to share with the internet.

Sometimes the notes make it into the review, sometimes they don't.

Regardless, I usually have about a page's worth of scribbles that come to mind during my playtime. Call of Duty: Black Ops, the latest entry in the long running franchise, is an anomaly in that this was not the case. In fact when I finished the single player mode and had spent some time with multiplayer, I was a little surprised to find that I had written only one word.

That one word was "competent." After a total of roughly eight hours with Black Ops that's the extent of what had jumped out at me. Nothing profound, nothing grievously awful, and nothing particularly noteworthy. Just... competent.

The campaign is as standard as can be found in an FPS. I ran through several hallways (or what amounted to hallways), shot bad guys with various types of weapons whilst they yelled things in some foreign language, took part in a few vehicle oriented segments, and watched some scripted events where I pressed buttons and cool things happened.

The firefights were enjoyable and intense overall. Combat in and of itself was sufficiently challenging, but the game was so overbearing it felt like I was playing an extremely long tutorial level. Almost the entire game is spent either following one of my squadmates (who apparently don't care if a guy runs right past them to stab me in the back) or going to some sort of HUD marker. While telling me where to go and what I need to do is certainly important, having my hand held nearly the entire time makes it feel extremely shallow.

Saying the story was enough to keep me from getting bored doesn't sound all that great, but it's the truth. The soldier/spy intrigue was done well enough to keep me interested, but beyond that there isn't anything all that fascinating. While it might seem like Black Ops is trying to say something about the historical events around which it is based, ultimately the Vietnam War and the Bay of Pigs invasion serve as nothing more than window dressing for the thin Tom Clancy-like plot.

The multiplayer evokes much the same feelings as the campaign—solid, enjoyable, but nothing special. I didn't see anything here that I hadn't seen in other similar games. I did find it to be fairly accessible as I was performing reasonably well within my first few matches, though. Rewards such as extra weapons and class configurations came quickly, and the ins and outs of playing against other people were pretty easy to pick up. It's good for a few romps every now and then, but I don't see myself sinking much more time into it.

At first glance, the much-hyped zombie mode might seem like the genuinely unique portion of the game. However, the novelty of John F. Kennedy, Fidel Castro, Richard Nixon, and Robert McNamara all grabbing guns and going on a zombie hunt loses its appeal pretty quick. As a result we're stuck with what amounts to a cheap knockoff of Left 4 Dead's survival mode, with only two maps to boot—and while JFK's snarky one-liners are usually good for a chuckle, zombie mode is actually the weakest part of Black Ops.

Trying to put "yeah, it's OK" into a full article is harder than one might think. Games that stir strong feelings are much easier to write about, simply because I'll have a ready supply of superlatives to churn out into paragraphs. In this case, there's really not much else to say here—the FPS is a somewhat stagnant genre nowadays, and Black Ops is Exhibit A as to why. There's no real creative risk being taken, and while that might be just fine for sales figures, it doesn't bode well for Call of Duty: Black Ops' ability to stand out artistically in the immensely flooded FPS market. Rating: 6.0 out of 10.

Disclosures: This game was obtained via retail download and reviewed on the PC. Approximately 6 hours of play was devoted to single-player modes (completed 1 time) and 2 hours of play in multiplayer modes.

Parents: The game has been rated M by the ESRB, and contains blood and gore, intense violence, and strong language. Those content descriptors and the rating should be pretty self-explanatory. No kids, folks.

Deaf & Hard of Hearing: You should be fine. Audio is never a major factor in gameplay, and every meaningful spoken line is subtitled. In multiplayer you'll be at a slight disadvantage since you obviously won't be able to use voice chat, but it shouldn't be too much of a problem unless you want to play competitively.

Category Tags
Platform(s): Xbox 360   Wii   PS3   Nintendo DS   PC  
Developer(s): Treyarch  
Publisher: Activision  
Series: Call of Duty  
Genre(s): Shooting   Online/Multiplayer  
ESRB Rating: Mature (17+)  
Articles: Game Reviews  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

black ops review

I would have to respectfully disagree with the comment that zombies is the worst aspect of the game. In world at war zombies was played a lot by many many people and i'm happy that they brought it back in black ops.

In my personal opinion after beating story mode, playing zombies, and playing in online freeplay and wager matches i would say the multiplayer aspect of the game is its weakest link...The new weapons are cool and all but the graphics on the maps, how the guns look like plastic toys, and the cheap firework sounding explosions are a real setback.

Overall though i think the game was decently good, or competent as put in the review. If it all came down to a vote on the best COD game released i would have to give it hands down to modern warfare 2 for the realistic building graphics, excellent portrayal of the look of the guns, precise explosion sounds, and its yet to be unmatched online multiplayer gameplay. (urdadbunk)

I totally agree with every

I totally agree with every word, well said. I think the as-expected rave reviews for the game are yet more proof of the immaturity of most of the gaming press.

Infinity ward created the

Infinity ward created the best COD's, the modern warfare series. Treyarch have completed possibly the worst COD, world at war (seriously, have you tried playing that on the hardest level, granade much?) and a good, but not great black ops.

Multiplayer - I think this is the strongest part of black ops, but they haven't advanced much from modern warfare 1, if at all.

Zombies - If you haven't played it on world at war then it will provide you with some fun, for about an hour... maybe more if you are with friends.

Story - Did not live up to even my lowest expectations, I almost couldn't be bothered completing it, if you are waiting for something to finish, you know you don't have a good game on your hands.

Lack of co op - Best thing about Modern warfare 2 was co op, why destroy a bad thing? I won't go out of my way to buy a treyarch game again, they have lost my vote of confidence.

Modern Warfare 1 - 4/5 (infinity)
Modern Warfare 2 - 5/5 (infinity)
World at war - 1/5 (treyarch)
Black ops - 3/5 (treyarch)

Okay, here is my idea. Create a game with the following.
1. The destructive map, aircraft and tanks of Bad company 2.
2. The online multiplayer of modern warfare/black ops
3. The co-op missions like modern warfare 2
4. Campaign missions, possibly 5 different, short ones with zombies to keep those fans happy.

Keep the good stuff, drop the rest... is it really that hard?

Black ops

I also do agree with you on that zombie mode is really fun and it's good that they put it back in cod. I still have to disagree with you on that modern warfare 2 would be the best call of duty. You obviously haven't played the multiplayer all that much if you say that it was good. Modern warfare 2 multiplayer was horrificly unbalanced and frustrating. I have played mw2 mutliplayer over 20 days and i know what im talking about.

I disagree, WaW on hardcore

I disagree, WaW on hardcore was brilliant and Treyarch also made COD 3 which had a very good multiplayer and single player game.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.