GameCritics.com - Smart Reviews for Serious Gamers
News spacer Reviews spacer Features spacer Forums spacer About Us spacer FAQ
Unreal Tournament
Platform < PC >      Developer < Epic Games / Digital Extremes >      Publisher < GT Interactive >
Related Features
Quake III: Arena vs. Unreal Tournament Article
"Taking Shots at X-Files FPS Episode" Editorial
In-House Roundup
Aliens Versus Predator
Deus Ex: The Conspiracy
GoldenEye 007
Kingpin: Life Of Crime
Quake III: Arena
Quake III: Arena (DC)
Turok: Rage Wars
Scorecard
3Dgaming.net A
Adrenaline Vault 4½stars
FiringSquad 4 stars
GamePen 4½ stars
GameSpot 9.4
Game Revolution A-
IGN 9.6
2nd Op By
by Chi Kong Lui
Chi Kong Lui
8.0
RATING

In this case, I agree with much of what Dale has written. We're in agreement that the navigation menus in Unreal Tournament are extremely well done and definitely friendlier than the sparse ones found in Quake III: Arena (Q3A). I also agree that the vocal insults and bolsterings definitely have more bite than the annoying text-based chattering that goes on in Q3A. I also further concur that 'Bots' in Unreal Tournament, despite looking a little bland, also seem to react more naturally than the ones in Q3A. Yet, by far, the one thing that makes Unreal Tournament such a worthy contender for the online multiplayer crown is the sheer amount of options that it offers over Q3A. There are more degrees of difficulty in Bot configurations, more different styles of play beyond CTF and classic Deathmatching, more maps to choose from, and even more diverse weapons (each sports an alternate fire option, which adds an entirely new dimension to the game). Almost across the board, Unreal Tournament brings more to the table than Q3A.

Yet, even with all those incentives, why do I disagree with Dale and feel that Q3A is the better of the two? Simple. When all is said and done, one of the main reasons online multiplayers are such a thrill is the competition of people from around the world. The chance to see how well your skills match up against others from all over. So in order to be properly gauge how well you play, you need to go up against the best. And since people playing Quake have been doing it for years and have evolved their technique along with the series, it is arguable that the best competitors are the ones who have played right up to Q3A. There's no doubt in my mind that Unreal Tournament is an excellent game with many positives under its belt and no one will be disappointed with what it offers. It just doesn't have that legacy and reputation that is Q3A's birthright. Q3A may offer less, but like Dale said in his review, both games are still essentially focused on Deathmatches and in that sense, Q3A inherits more evolved gameplay and the serious competitors needed to push the level of play a notch higher than everyone else.

- Published January 26, 2000

Reader Second Opinions


Previous Page: Main Review

Home  >  Reviews Directory  >  Main Review  >  Second/Public Opinion(s)
Copyright 1999-2007 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Contact Us

Make a Donation:
Sales Affiliations:
How do these links help support the site?