GameCritics.com - Smart Reviews for Serious Gamers
News spacer Reviews spacer Features spacer Forums spacer About Us spacer FAQ
Splinter Cell Essentials
Platform < PSP >      Developer < Ubisoft >      Publisher < Ubisoft >

Screenshots: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5
Review By
by Brad Gallaway
Brad Gallaway
Consumer Advice
ESRB Rating: Mature (17+) Strong Language, Violence
Parents should be aware that while the game emphasizes being sneaky and passing through areas unseen, the game is populated with enemy soldiers and a fairly realistic slant; no big bugs or aliens here. It's often necessary (or just easier) to kill or disable the opposition, and Sam Fisher has a wide variety of techniques. Parents who are sensitive to this type of violence should steer their children clear. There are also a small handful of instances with stiff language, though nothing that you probably wouldn't hear on late-night network TV. There is no sexual content or sexual situations. Splinter Cell fanatics might find enough here to justify the time spent playing the game, especially since there are several connections to the upcoming sequel. However, the graphics are bad, the control is bad, and some of the missions are rehashes from the earlier games in the series. My suggestion would be to let Essentials pass you by unless you absolutely have to play every single game in the series. PSP action fans should forget it. The control issues are significant and the gameplay is so clunky and unsatisfying that your money is better spent elsewhere. Deaf and Hard of Hearing gamers will probably encounter serious difficulty playing this game. Although there is text accompanying much of the conversation, not all speech is subtitled. Going further, listening for audio cues is a significant part of playing the game. Oftentimes, the only way to know that you are not alone is to listen for snatches of conversation or for the footsteps of guards nearby. Combine missed audio cues with extremely awkward controls, and you've got a perfect recipe for frustration.

Related Links
Splinter Cell
Hitman: Contracts
Ghost Recon
SOCOM II: U.S. Navy SEALs
Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow

Some things were not meant to be. Time machines, Republican administrations that care about the welfare of the country, and fat-free donuts that actually taste like donuts are all things that people wish for but can't really ever exist. Another thing to add to this list of impossibles? A respectable version of Splinter Cell on the PSP. Although this third-person espionage franchise has only gotten better on consoles, some objectives are simply beyond the capability of sneaky superspy Sam Fisher; going portable is one of them.

Simply put, the game can't hang on PSP. It's a terrible fit. There are a slew of issues to deal with in Essentials— any one on its own wouldn't be disastrous, but all of them together combined ends up amounting to a supremely dissatisfying experience. The underlying flaw that contributes to all of the other problems is that the developers failed to take the PSP's strengths and weaknesses into account. Instead of getting a sublime experience tailor-made for play on the go, the end result is a clunky, awkward formula squashed down and shoehorned into a place it was never meant to be.

The prime example of this flawed plan is the intolerable camera. A stealth game like Splinter Cell requires a constant, high level of environmental awareness for success. Without a second analog stick, Essentials is hamstrung by mapping camera control to the circle button and making Sam completely stop when the viewpoint is moved. Then, when Sam starts prowling again, the camera remains exactly where it was left. Complicating things is the fact that if Sam is spotted by an enemy, it's impossible to quickly plan an escape routes because he can't look and move at the same time. Did no one testing the game see this as a problem? The camera scheme is totally regressive and unacceptable in an era where we should be progressing towards ease of use and practicality.

The other functions in Essentials suffer from the same lack of optimization for the PSP, just like the unwieldy camera. For example, each of the directions on the D-pad serves double duty; tapping left switches between vision modes, holding left lets Sam hug a wall. Tapping up goes into his binoculars, holding it opens his inventory. It's not very elegant or natural, especially when one takes into account the impossibility of moving Sam or maneuvering the camera without the game grinding to a halt. And while I'm on the topic of control, it baffled me that Sam could not vary his movement speed on-the-fly. The inability to change movement speeds totally defeats the purpose of having analog control at all.

Besides the control problems, it's just a fact that some games need a certain level of graphic quality for the experience to be fully realized. Splinter Cell is one of these games. After all, a sophisticated display of light, dark, and shadow is something the series has built itself on. Although Splinter Cell on a console is a leader in graphics, Essentials in its current state doesn't even begin to make the cut.

The game is dark— so dark it's nearly impossible to see anything on screen unless the PSP is played in a low-light or dark area, a serious problem for a game designed to be played on a portable. Clicking on Sam's nightvision goggles is a partial solution, but not an effective or satisfying one. It's granted that the PSP is already inclined to have some glare problems due to the highly reflective screen, but things here are so hard to see that I had to play this game under my desk at work before I could even begin to get my bearings; playing it outside or in my car was impossible.

Other presentation issues abound, like literally seeing the inside of Sam's head when the camera is in a small space, or the way the camera gets hung up on environmental objects. The architecture comes off as blocky and simple, and the artificial intelligence is poor, a perfect example being when I opened a door and accidentally bumped a guard standing on the other side of it. He did not move, or even react as I opened and closed the door, hitting him several times. I counted six impacts before I got bored with the experiment and bashed him out of the way.

To make an embarrassing story short, Splinter Cell: Essentials is a mess. For a series that leads the stealth genre and has worked hard to make itself more accessible and more polished with each successive sequel, an entry like this—even on a portable— can only be seen as a miserable failure. Back to boot camp, Sam. The mission is aborted.

RATING: 3.0
Published: May 24, 2006


Second Opinion(s)
What do you think of the game? Write your own review or discuss in forums.

None available at this time.


Copyright 1999-2007 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Contact Us

Make a Donation:
Sales Affiliations:
How do these links help support the site?