About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Soul Calibur III – Review

Chi Kong Lui's picture

In Soul Calibur III, I am a lowly level 10 Saint-class warrior dressed in a traditional Chinese changbao robe and armed with a magically elongating Monkey King-style quarterstaff. Across from me is my opponent, the 1000 pound, level 60 barbarian, Astaroth, with his 2000 pound "great" sword.

The omnipresent announcer chimes "Fight" and I lunge at Astaroth with a wide swing. It's deftly blocked. I sidestep and twirl my staff in big circular attacking motions. No success. I step back and launch a powerful missile-like staff attack, but again, I fail to find my mark. Astaroth rushes me a sweeping upward blow that sends me straight into the air. I'm struck several more times in mid flight with only a fraction of my health remaining before hitting the floor. I recover off the ground, but I'm nervous now. I've lost my composure. What do I do next? My mind races through the unending list of moves available, but Astaroth doesn't afford me a split-second to focus. He's right in my face and the horrific finishing blow that I don't see coming follows. This one takes my legs from underneath me and it's over. Astaroth-12, Chi-0.

It would take me several more humiliating matches before I could manage to discover and employ a more effective technique and as luck would have it, I managed to finally defeat Astaroth. However, there was little time to savor the victory because it didn't take long before I would encounter another tough adversary and go through the same trial-and-defeat process before I would emerge victorious. All another win meant was another opponent to struggle against. Not all battles were so difficult, but the pattern remained the same. The ebb and flow of the battles frustrated and drained me to the point of mental exhaustion.

Boxing is often called the "sweet science." The strategy, execution and skill make up the "science" and I'm assuming the thrill and satisfaction of victory is what makes it "sweet." In Soul Calibur III, I feel there's very little "science" that goes into the combat and consequently, victory isn't particularly "sweet."

That's not to say that the weapons-based combat that drives the heart of the gameplay in Soul Calibur III is not complex or wrought with intricacies. Being the third part in the series in addition to hundreds of similar types of versus fighting games, the multitude of rules and deep mechanics that govern the types of strikes, counters and damage in the game are finely tuned and well tested.

The problem is that all the development and evolution hasn't resulted in a more satisfying test of wills. Mental toughness, strategy and training aren't the decisive factors they should be. Classic maxims of competition like honor and courage have little place in the arena. The ultimate deciding factor in Soul Calibur like so many other competitive videogames is patience and endurance. Patience is required to find the most effective "cheesy" technique that will work and endurance is necessary to be able to exploit it ad nauseam until victory is achieved.

I'm reminded of Bruce Lee's reflections on different fighting styles. To paraphrase his thoughts, he believed that since humans typically have two arms and two legs, there shouldn't be a huge disparity in terms of what works in hand-to-hand combat. The best answer is usually the simplest one. That's not to say that there shouldn't be a variety of different techniques. However, the dictionary-length list of moves afforded to each character in Soul Calibur III is counter-intuitive to what this game is about: defeating your opponent. What's the point of having hundreds of techniques (most of which are useless) when a player—even with extensive training—would probably only end up remembering and using under a dozen of those moves consistently?

To take the battle to the next level, one has to wade through the exhaustive list of moves to determine which techniques are most effective and the kicker is that the most effective ones usually defy any form of reality or functional logic in the amount of damage distributed and the control scheme employed to execute that attack. In some cases, the best attacks were never intended by the developers. Exploiting difficult to defend attacks, bugs in the fighting system, and holes in the computer artificial intelligence in order to gain an advantage isn't a rarity. It's best practice. I'm not so much testing my abilities against someone as I'm just trying to find one or two unbalanced techniques to abuse. Call it whatever you want, but don't call it fighting.

The exploitation dynamic improves marginally to something a little more organic when facing off against a human opponent, but the heart of the fighting gameplay sadly doesn't change. Gamer abuse is a phenomenon that occurs throughout many competitive videogames, whether it is sports or martial arts. The problem didn't originate with Soul Calibur III and it would seem unfair for the game to shoulder the brunt of this criticism, but I do criticize the game for not improving the situation. If anything, the increasingly growing cast with more ludicrous weaponry and more attacks has only made things worse.

For those who don't mind martial arts that border on the fantastic and don't expect honor and courage in battles and enjoy the well established rules and mechanics of these types of two-player fighting games, Soul Calibur III is the cream of the crop. There's a variety of new mission modes with much bonus content to unlock. There's even a beautifully comprehensive and slick create-a-fighter option which I used to create the fighter described at the beginning of this review.

In the past, I accepted and enjoyed many versus-type fighting games like Soul Calibur III. I even gave the original Soul Calibur an incredibly positive review. However, as with most sequels, the developers are compelled to add more and in this particular case, adding more characters and moves takes away from what the core experience should be about. This coupled with my recent fascination and growing knowledge of mixed martial arts, boxing and other pugilistic sports has changed my perception of what I appreciate about competitive fighting and what I think about these types of games. I can accept but no longer appreciate the conventions of the past that Soul Calibur III upholds and I look forward to a game that embodies the newer and more reality-based ideals of competitive fighting. Rating: 7 out of 10

Category Tags
Platform(s): PS2  
Developer(s): Namco  
Publisher: Namco Bandai  
Series: Soul Calibur  
Genre(s): Fighting  
ESRB Rating: Teen (13+)  
Articles: Game Reviews  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The Point

Have you ever noticed that there is a fundamental difference in the way fighting is depicted in Japanese developed and Western developed fighting games? Whereas Japanese games in the genre tend to focus on the techniques and moves themselves, Western games tend to focus on the damage inflicted on the characters. A look at the Def Jam and recent Mortal Kombat games, compared to Virtua Fighter and Soul Calibur should be enough to prove that point. Even the victors in Def Jam are often left black & blue and bleeding. In contrast, even the weapon-based combat of Soul Calibur doesn't leave anyone with so much as a nick. While defeating an opponent is clearly one of the main points of Soul Calibur III, part of the excitement of the game comes from seeing the moves and martial arts themselves. That excitement might be even more important that simply winning.

Jackie Chan once said that martial arts, "is like a dance." As you said, it is probably the case that a single player will remember about a dozen moves and use them exclusively as his or her own fighting style, negating the need for the rest of the moves to even exist. Another single player could do exactly the same thing. However, if both used the same character and there were only a dozen moves to chose from, then both players would have exactly the same fighting styles, which probably wouldn't result in a very exciting dance to watch. By adding more moves, Soul Calibur III enhances the dance.

Your assertion that the game lacks the requirements of fighting, "mental toughness, strategy and training," seems to stem from the fact that you see these elements in the game but feel that they are more aptly described as patience and endurance to find exploits and use them repeatedly. Surely you can see that, save the search for exploits, the two are the same. Mental toughness and training require patience and endurance. The numerous ways to attack, defend, and counterattack provide for lot of strategy, and having the control to execute when the time is right requires mental toughness and training. If the game was entirely exploit driven, I highly doubt it would have the fan base it has today.

I think you have underestimated how well Soul Calibur III does simulate the various subtleties associated with martial arts because you've ignored the role that the player has in the experience. While the digital characters may have no honor or courage, the people playing do. It takes courage to take up the control in a tournament when you know you'll lose, but there is honor in trying, even if you know the outcome. The game is not just the program on the disc. It's also the people using it.

Def Jam was programed by

Def Jam was programed by Japanese developers Aki, but agree with your point about the differences in Eastern and Western tastes. That's something I'll have to consider in future reviews.

As far as Soul Calibur III goes, you're taking my words a bit out of context. Its funny you bring up Jackie Chan because what you described reminds me of what happened to HK wuxia/heroic bloodshed movies in the seventies. Audiences grew tired of all the elaborate animal styles and the "dancing" that dragged on and on to boredom. HK audiences were thrilled by Bruce Lee's no-nonsense KO style that he brought to pictures.

That's sort of what's happening here with fighting games. I'm seeing a whole lot of fluff as far as the "dancing" goes and not enough substance. Mixed martial arts has taught us so much about fighting in the last 10 years. Its a shame that no developer has really capitalized on that.

The reality is, fans of these games aren't really fighters because otherwise they'd know that these games are the farthest things from actual fighting.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.