About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Growlanser: Wayfarer of Time Review

Mike Bracken's picture

A Tactical RPG for People Who Hate Tactical RPGs?

Growlanser: Wayfarer of Time Screenshot

HIGH Executing a flawless plan of attack in an important story battle.

LOW Sitting through the first ten hours or so as the game sets up its predictable story.

WTF Do I really want to find and try on different outfits for my bad anime-inspired helper?

Sony's PlayStation Portable (PSP) might be dead as far as most gamers are concerned, but don't tell the folks at Atlus. The company follows up the recent release of strategy role-playing game (SRPG) Gungnir with yet another tactical adventure in the form of Growlanser: Wayfarer of Time.

This newest Growlanser title is only new for American audiences—the game was originally released as the fourth installment of the series back on the Japanese PlayStation 2 way back in 2003. Those who haven't played the previous Growlanser titles (several of which turned up on our shores during the PS2's lifespan) shouldn't be put off from this experience. Wayfarer of Time works quite nicely as a standalone adventure. The game certainly shows its age in spots, but the overall package should appeal to fans of Japanese role-playing games (JRPG).

The title's story sticks to the genre template early on. Players take control of Crevanille, a young mercenary who was found as a child outside of a ruin. This will make him mankind's biggest savior when angels appear one day and start destroying everything on the planet. Crevanille will use his special powers to combat the angelic threat and team up with his ragtag band of compatriots to (hopefully) save the day. Ho-hum.

Wayfarer of Time's story is arguably its weakest link. Anyone who's experienced a JRPG in the past decade will instantly be familiar with what's going on. The characters aren't particularly well-drawn—they're mostly archetypes—and the opening ten or so hours are a slog as the game bogs down repeatedly with extended story interludes. Unfortunately, the story isn't interesting or original enough to spend this amount of time on setting it all up.

Those who stick with it will eventually be rewarded as Growlanser does open up and actually lets players play the game instead of sitting through dreadful dialogue and pointless cutscenes. This is where the title begins to work its way toward redemption.

Unlike the standard SRPG which is a grid-based chess-like affair, Wayfarer of Time is much more freeform. Think of it like a jazz solo in comparison to a carefully conducted classical concert. The traditional SRPGs spend lots of time with precise movements and turn-based combat—something that's technically proficient, if a bit staid and predictable. Growlanser, meanwhile, attempts to open up the gameplay and speed players along through what are usually lengthy campaign scenarios in a much more engaging way. The result is a solid tactical RPG that feels designed to cater to people who don't really like tactical RPGs.

Growlanser: Wayfarer of Time Screenshot

There are no grids on the game's battlefields and no traditional turn-based combat. Instead, players are free to move about the map at will with everything based on a timer gauge. Players will issue commands and the characters will perform them whenever the time gauge allows them to act. They will then continue these actions until they're instructed to do something else (which is a mere button click away and can be activated at any time during a combat engagement). While this freeform approach is a welcome change of pace, it does have one minor drawback: the game occasionally feels like it's playing itself. Part of the allure of SRPGs is being the general and micromanaging the troops. That's possible in Wayfarer, but the game does have a tendency to run quite well on autopilot.

The combat gets a little more robust as the game advances—it features rings that can be customized to add different sorts of attacks and defense instead of weapons and armor—and story interlude battles often require far more resource management than the standard field fights (primarily because they feature more involved objectives than just "kill everyone"). That being said, compulsive tinkerers might be disappointed by the "hands-off" elements of the gameplay in much of the early going.

The bigger story fights are really where Growlanser shines—although objectives aren't always quite as clear as they could be. This will lead to mission failures and restarts so that the player learns how best to attack a particular scenario. Unfortunately, there's not a lot of deviation in how the AI handles those fights—so the second go-round is likely to be just like the first, eliminating some of the "thinking on the fly" elements that make these sorts of experiences so engaging. The upside is that players shouldn't ever get stuck on a mission for any extended length of time.

Those complaints aside, Wayfarer of Time does manage to create an interesting variation on the traditional SRPG combat formula. It's not perfect, but once it gets rolling it did keep me involved.

When not in the field, Growlanser keeps players busy advancing the plot through conversations (and after the weak opening, the story does eventually come to feature some twists and turns) and working on interpersonal relationships that affect the game's ending. There are multiple endings (over 40 in all) to be experienced in Wayfarer of Time, so the decisions matter. It will reportedly take four playthroughs to see all of the endings.

Issues aside, it's hard to discount the feeling of nostalgia that permeates Growlanser: Wayfarer of Time. Gamers like me, who experienced the golden age of the JRPG firsthand, will undoubtedly enjoy this title despite the occasional misstep. It's easy to say that they don't make JRPGs like this anymore—but at least companies like Atlus are willing to port them to modern hardware for an appreciative niche audience. Gamers looking for a trip down memory lane, an interesting reminder of the good ol' days of the form, or one last hurrah for their PSP will want to give Wayfarer of Time a shot. Rating: 7.0 out of 10.

Disclosures: This game was obtained via the publisher and reviewed on the PSP. Approximately 55 hours of play was devoted to single-player modes (completed 1 time). There are no multiplayer modes.

Parents: According to the ESRB, this game contains blood, fantasy violence, mild language, and suggestive themes. Parents will want to take note of Wafarer of Time's Teen rating, but there's nothing overly objectionable in the game as a whole. Sure, the busty anime chick stereotype lives on in the game's world, but it's not particularly risque. If your kid likes JRPGs and plays them regularly, there's nothing to be too concerned about here.

Deaf & Hard of Hearing: The game's standard scenes are presented in text—but unfortunately the anime cutscenes (which are big moments in the narrative) are voice-acted. I could not find an option to turn on subtitles for them, meaning hearing-impaired gamers will be missing out on a big part of the experience.

Category Tags
Platform(s): PSP  
Developer(s): Careersoft  
Publisher: Atlus  
Series: Growlanser  
Genre(s): Role-Playing   Strategy/Sim  
ESRB Rating: Teen (13+)  
Articles: Game Reviews  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thanks for the review, it

Thanks for the review, it was informative and told me a few things other reviews failed to mention. I definitely want to own this game now. If it wasn't for Atlus and Xseed we would be in the doldrums as far as having fresh JRPGs to play.

A question concerning:

"Gamers like me, who experienced the golden age of the JRPG firsthand"

Out of curiosity, what specific era do you consider to be the "golden age" of JRPGs?

Glad the review was useful

Glad the review was useful for you.

For me, the golden era of JRPGs was the 16-bit years. I really enjoyed the PSX era as well, but my fondest memories and my all-time favorite JRPGs were generally on the SNES and the Genesis. I've played a bazillion JRPGs over the years, but that era really stands as the pinnacle of the form for me. That's not to say there haven't been great titles in other years -- but for me, everything has to sort of measure up against those 16-bit games.

SNES era was good for JRPG's..

... because the game actually focused on combat and gameplay systems.

Modern RPG's have pretty much gutted any kind of complexity. FF12 plays itself. I'd love for someone to remake Final fantasy 1 but ADD all sorts of new things instead of just being mostly a graphical update.

I will never forget running across a cave and in fear of WIZARDS being XXX'd by the cave boss and RUB'd!

Modern games just don't have the same fear factor. I wish Xenosaga didn't have such a bad combat system. Most modern JRPG's have not really done anything to come up with cool combat systems in a long time. All the money is spent aping others or on story/graphics.

Thanks Mike for your

Thanks Mike for your clarification.

I also grew up on 8 and 16 bit JRPGs. The first one I ever played was Phantasy Star actually. I think to boil it all down 16 bit JRPGs focused on the gameplay more and the presentation less, that made them tighter and more focused. Conversely grind was added as padding in place of FMVs and mini-games, so let's not let nostalgia overtake us.

However, I disagree with anonymous that FFXII plays itself. It -can- play itself, what with the gambits and all of that. However later in the game when enemies become more dangerous (not to mention high caliber marks) you absolutely must take direct control of your party members often. IMO FFXII was one of the greatest JRPGs of the past 10 years, I enjoyed nearly every minute of the 109 hours I put into beating it. But let's not go off on a tangent.

This newly released (to the USA anyway) Growlanser is probably the last PSP JRPG we're going to get, outside of Class of Heroes II, so it is with bittersweet comfort that I shall buy this game. Bitter only because there are still legions of unlocalized PSP JRPGs we'll likely never see... but sweet because Atlus still carries the torch as best they can.

Missing the point...

... even without scripted combat. The combat system in FF12 is pretty bad. You're not able to perceive what I'm saying because you're thinking with emotions not logic. You've never sat down to deconstruct these gameplay systems.

FF12 was copying MMO's and MMO's are known for boring combat because of issues regarding internet latency.

Anyone who complains about "grind" and "padding" is a new generation gamer that wants story and cinematics over actual gameplay. 99% of what you DO in an RPG is combat, the rest is just going from story NPC to story NPC (which requires no gameplay elements). Story and cinematics is NOT gameplay its passive stuff. Gameplay requires your significant involvement and participation, story in 99% of RPG's do not.

"Grind" is what most early games were about and it's insulting to even call it that because it shows the person is A) clueless B) Cant' even think properly about games. 99% of what you do in any RPG is combat, if it sucks then people call it "a grind" or if that person HATES GAMEPLAY (does not come to games FOR GAMEPLAY but story which is non-gameplay related since its passive/noninteractive).

The real issue is making the combat system deep and interesting so that it takes a long time before the fun wears off. Civilization is a game that coined "just one more turn" we don't have any RPG's as deep as civilization in terms of their fun and gameplay systems. That is a crying shame really. This is all because of the story based RPG player who hates gameplay systems. Even though we should have these games we don't because of the types of player who is not a gameplay type but a story/cinematic watcher type. FF12 is definitely for made for those people.

This is the problem with game criticism when anyone gets emotionally connected to a game most people end up not basing their opinions on solid analyis and understanding of gameplay. Your post just comes off as someone who is not in a place to be giving informed assessments between games from the 16-Bit era and today.

There is a reason people hold the 16-bit era up and it's one that people who defend modern RPG's with their cinematics can't understand sadly. They don't really understand what gameplay is.

If you mathematically charted where a player spends his time in a game large chunks of it are in the actual important gameplay system (combat) if that isn't designed well and/or fun people will call it "grind" or if the player doesn't really LIKE COMBAT then he insults it by saying its "padding" and "a grind" and "those old games are just awful grindfests".

But this just shows how they don't understand anything about games. You take the combat out of any classic RPG you don't even have a game. Same could be said of even modern "RPG's" you take the combat out and there's only scripted movie left.

A curmudgeon draws near!

"You're not able to perceive what I'm saying because you're thinking with emotions not logic."

Considering all of the ridiculous ad hominem based attacks you made in your response, I'd say you're the one being emotional.

"You've never sat down to deconstruct these gameplay systems."

I sat down in front of FFXII for 109 hours engaged in its gameplay systems fully. I know of what I speak.

"FF12 was copying MMO's and MMO's are known for boring combat because of issues regarding internet latency."

FFXII's battle system was not inspired by MMOs, it was inspired by the NFL. Go do your research and read interviews with Hiroyuki Ito and you'll find out I was right.

"Anyone who complains about "grind" and "padding" is a new generation gamer that wants story and cinematics over actual gameplay."

I've been playing video games for over 30 years holmes. My first JRPG was the original Phantasy Star on the Master System. Even then, so long ago, it bothered me to endlessly battle for experience and money. What you are confusing for enjoyable battles are actually thinly disguised veils concealing a cheap way to artificially lengthen a game's time to completion. Why should it take 100 battles to save up enough money for a new set of armor, instead of only 10 battles? Likely the battles will be against the same few monsters in the same confined area, so how is this continuously interesting? It's not. It's boring. It's a GRIND. And as much as you might not realize it, grinding is a REAL thing and is a staple of JRPGs since Dragon Quest. Read up on it some more:


Before you assume it doesn't exist. Millions of people would disagree with you, and much of those folks are classic gamers.

"99% of what you DO in an RPG is combat"

Unless you're playing an SRPG that is not even remotely accurate. That entirely forgets the ROLE PLAYING part of an RPG. Proper RPGs be they WRPG or JRPG will have a lot more to offer than just battling. If they don't, they are not much of an RPG and more of a BPG (battle playing game!).

"FF12 is definitely for made for those people."

Again FFXII's battle system is as hands-on or hands-off as you want it to be. It's up to the player to manually control everything or use Gambits or a combination thereof.

"Your post just comes off as someone who is not in a place to be giving informed assessments between games from the 16-Bit era and today."

So you're going to judge my entire gaming credibility based on one tiny post I made? You have absolutely no idea how hardcore and insatiable of a gamer I am. My idea of a kick ass JRPG is SMT: Nocturne or Vagrant Story or Radia Senki: Reimeihen or so many others. You assume too much.

"There is a reason people hold the 16-bit era up and it's one that people who defend modern RPG's with their cinematics can't understand sadly."

Yes and I bought Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy 6, Secret Of Mana, Phantasy Star IV, and many others the same era they came out. I played Lufia II before it was cool to play that game. I know the era you're talking about and where you are coming from. But at the same time, to disregard newer stuff like FFXII or Xenoblade because they are so different is silly. All things must evolve or die including the JRPG.

"if the player doesn't really LIKE COMBAT then he insults it by saying its "padding" and "a grind" and "those old games are just awful grindfests"

A combat system is only fun insofar as the game continues to spice up the encounters with continued fresh combat, innovative twists, and increased challenge. When you are banging away at metal slimes just so you can beat the final boss, you are not enjoying the combat for it's own sake, rather you are absolutely grinding for experience. And this hurdle was often an intentional one in older JRPGs.

"Same could be said of even modern "RPG's" you take the combat out and there's only scripted movie left."

And I could agree with you about quite a few newer JRPGs. But you are absolutely wrong about FFXII. Just like most of the gaming populace is, so at least you're not alone.

Listen, if you want to continue this discussion let's take it off of Mike's great review, and over to: Romhacking.net

That's where I debate, under the name DankPanties. I'd be glad to have an in-depth discussion there with you. We're a pedantic bunch, you'd fit right in.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.