About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Go Back   GameCritics.com Forums > GameCritics.com Discussion > Community User Submissions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2009, 05:22 PM   #1
Boy
Pictured: Hope not crying
 
Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: with my generic dad
Posts: 4,110
Rep Power: 20 Boy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Boy
Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

Note: I am aware of A) the oldness of this game and B) it's complete irrelevance to the world of gaming in general. With that said, here's my review anyway!

High: The moment early in the game where the main character must turn on his allies is almost perfect,

Low: The rest of the game is just downhill from there.

WTF: Super Saiyans? In MY Drakengard?!

The original Drakengard was not a good game. Not by a long shot. Aside from a serviceable flight mode, it was essentially a Dynasty Warriors clone with a smaller moveset, only one playable character, no customization of stats, dumber enemy AI (amazingly, yes, dumber than hordes of Chinese soldiers running into the pointy end of your spear), and no objective more complicated than "kill mans". Having been released after fully FOUR Dynasty Warriors games, it's hard to imagine what the folks at Cavia were thinking when they created this game, and even more what Square Enix was thinking when they decided to publish it. Now, given the gravity of the confession I'm about to make, I should probably be telling it to a priest rather than including it in a review on the internet, but it is what it is: I loved Drakengard.

For all of it's failings, Drakengard had one saving grace. It had the most tangible atmosphere in any game I have ever played. The world of Drakengard is a world of futility and disappointment, and the music, cutscenes, and yes, even the gameplay all seemed to be striving in unison to convey this thematically. For such a critically flawed game, it had an impressive harmony of design that I have rarely witnessed before or since.

Now the fact that I've spent more time waxing poetic about its predecessor than talking about the game I'm supposed to be reviewing probably indicates how I feel about the sequel, but just so there's no confusion, I'll be clear. Drakengard 2 is not a good game...though the reasons for this differ from the first.

It seems the folks at Cavia were informed somewhere along the way that their Dynasty Warriors clone was garbage, perhaps by actually playing it themselves, and sought to remedy this issue. To an extent, they succeeded. The gameplay in Drakengard 2 is a smoother experience than in the first installment, and actually approaches something akin to fun from time to time. The new blood, Nowe, hacks apart hordes of no-name goons with as much gusto as Caim did, only this time he brought playable friends. In addition to having a different fighting style, each character excels against specific types of enemies, giving the player some incentive to switch things up during missions.

Missions themselves have been improved too. In the original, the objective rarely, if ever, deviated from kill these (hundreds of) specific braindead targets. Here, there are time limits on completing certain tasks and minor puzzle solving from time to time. It's nothing exciting, but it adds a little something to keep your eyes from glazing over.

Herein lies Drakengard 2's principle gameplay flaw. It seems content to do just enough to keep you from falling asleep in your chair, and nothing more. A perfect example of this is the flight missions, which are virtually identical to those in the original. I suppose the fact that they were already kind of alright meant that Cavia couldn't be bothered to improve on it at all. The minor gameplay enhancements in the ground mode of the game do make the game less painful, but "less painful" and "actually enjoyable" aren't synonymous.

I'd be lying if I said I ever expected much of Drakengard 2 though. Something about the absolutely abortive gameplay of the original told me I'd only be setting myself up for disappointment if I had. What I did expect was another heaping helping of the dismal, depressing and oh so delicious atmosphere of the first. It is in this aspect that Drakengard 2 commits it's most grievous sin.

It's hard to imagine someone who has played the first game looking forward to playing the sequel because they loved the gameplay. It's less hard, but still pretty difficult, to imagine someone buying Drakengard 2 without having ever played the first, given that it garnered a lukewarm critical reception at the time of it's release. So I'm going to go out on a limb here and posit that the majority of people interested in the sequel were looking forward to a reprisal of the of thematic elements of the original.

Drakengard 2 tosses all of this out of the window with a banal story about a young boy with superpowers leaving and later opposing a secretly evil order of knights who basically rule the world. If it left it at that, it would have merely been bad, but the way in which they squander opportunities for greater depth of story borders on offensive. The game is surprisingly timid about stepping into the gray areas that were so commonplace in the original. The resurfacing of a main villian, this time as an ally, and the story of Nowe's birth and upbringing are both situations that could have resulted in some interesting conflicts. However the game essentially presents these facts and then leaves them alone, as if they create depth just by being present.

The rest of the story content is fluff about righteousness, destiny, fanservice-y character cameos, love blossoming on the battlefield, and the dangers of evil techno dragons who live in a borg cube, all of it torn straight from the pages of the generic anime playbook.

It may seem petty to criticize a game so heavily for failing to replicate the feel of the original, but Drakengard is a game where the only thing it had going for it was it's feel. The gameplay of Drakengard 2, while slightly better than it's predecessor, is still leagues behind competitors in the genre, and the only chance it had of setting itself apart from the other games languishing alongside it in bargain bin hell was a casualty of these minor improvements. 3.5

Disclosures: This game was obtained via purchase and reviewed on the PS2. Approximately 30 hours of play were spent on the game, and it was completed one time.

Parents: This game contains blood and violence and is rated M. When they said blood, they weren't kidding. The game has tons of it. On the other hand, it contains no mature themes to speak of, so depending on one's stance on exposing teen to violent games, it could go either way. Parents will probably want to keep younger kids away regardless.

Deaf & Hard of Hearing: While the ground missions are fine for anyone to play, I noticed that while sound wasn't explicitly necessary for the flight missions, I found myself relying on it almost exclusively for reacting to certain types of enemies. These missions ARE mandatory, so unless they are willing to put up with a not-insignificant amount of frustration, those with hearing issues are advised to avoid the game. Besides, it's terrible anyway!

Last edited by Boy; 07-22-2009 at 09:51 AM.
Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 07:05 PM   #2
Jason Karney
Pixel King
 
Jason Karney's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the land of confusion
Posts: 2,417
Rep Power: 17 Jason Karney is on a distinguished road
Re: Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

Hi Boy,

This is a great review! Nicely written with plenty of your voice coming through, and it gives me a good idea of what you thought of this game; and why.

I would break the third sentence into two; just because it's so long. And fine a place to note what a Super Saiyan is, for those of us who don't watch Dragonball. (A footnote at the end, possibly mentioning this is only relevant to Dragonball fans, would do -- and could fit in with your style.)

I approve this for publishing to our homepage. One more critic approval, and barring futher suggestions, you'll be good to go.

--Jason
Jason Karney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 08:13 PM   #3
Mike Bracken
Next-Gen Poster
 
Mike Bracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 2,854
Rep Power: 18 Mike Bracken is on a distinguished road
Re: Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boy View Post
Now the fact that I've spent more time waxing poetic about it's predecessor than talking about the game
You need that to read "its" and not "it's".

Quote:
Here, there are time limits on completing certain and minor puzzle solving from time to time.
You're missing a word after "certain".

Other than that, it looks pretty good. My only concern is that this game is fucking ancient. We've never been timely about covering shit, but wow--this is going waaaaaay back.
__________________
The Horror Geek.com
http://thehorrorgeek.com
Reviews, Rants, and News from The Horror Geek

My game collection: http://users.ign.com/collection/sadeian
Mike Bracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 12:05 AM   #4
Brad Gallaway
Demons are defeated
 
Brad Gallaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 3,988
Rep Power: 20 Brad Gallaway is on a distinguished road
Re: Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

Hey Boy,

Good work.. I like. My feedback would be to either delete or severely streamline paragraph 9 (the one about all the dads, etc...) it's too detailed and in-depth for what's otherwise a very high-level review. if nothing else, pare it down and make it jokier so the reader really sees what a mess it is.

otherwise, this is great.

B
__________________
Drink Coffeecola. It's good and good for you!
My Blog on Writing and Gaming
Brad Gallaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 09:57 AM   #5
Boy
Pictured: Hope not crying
 
Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: with my generic dad
Posts: 4,110
Rep Power: 20 Boy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Boy
Re: Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

So I applied the changes you guys have suggested. Any more suggestions are welcome.

Mike: I'm totally aware of this game's general mustiness but I only recently had the "pleasure" of playing it myself, and this is one of the few (perhaps only?) times that I've felt that game's general badness was personally insulting. This review was as much to get that off my chest than anything else. :P
Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009, 04:19 PM   #6
Mike Bracken
Next-Gen Poster
 
Mike Bracken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 2,854
Rep Power: 18 Mike Bracken is on a distinguished road
Re: Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

No worries man--I totally understand. It's good review regardless of how old the game is.
__________________
The Horror Geek.com
http://thehorrorgeek.com
Reviews, Rants, and News from The Horror Geek

My game collection: http://users.ign.com/collection/sadeian
Mike Bracken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 02:49 PM   #7
Jason Karney
Pixel King
 
Jason Karney's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the land of confusion
Posts: 2,417
Rep Power: 17 Jason Karney is on a distinguished road
Re: Please Rate This Review: Drakengard 2

Please add the second title, the catchy one we include with all reviews. Other than that you've gotten the necessary staff approvals, so you should be good to go for publishing.
Jason Karney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | FAQ | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999-2010 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.