View Single Post
Old 09-10-2013, 02:38 AM   #7
Spokker
64-bit Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 701
Rep Power: 13 Spokker is on a distinguished road
Re: Why did GameCritics never catch on?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi Kong Lui View Post
Where to start?
1) I wrote this back in 2008: Why game criticism doesn't exist
The demand explanation makes sense. It's also that the critic-publisher power dynamic is so lopsided toward the publisher. I don't think outright paid reviews are common as /v/ thinks they are, but publications are definitely spoonfed information, exclusive and otherwise, under the expectation of favorable coverage.

I like to think that Roger Ebert was not beholden to any movie studio (he was accused of being beholden to ABC on a few occasions). He was both a critic and reviewer. He was mainstream (what movie is good right now?) and intelligent (why is this movie good or bad?). He was also good at finding where the mainstream and the intelligent merged.

Another reason the GameCritics brand of criticism may not be in demand is because criticism is perceived as something bad. It's bad to criticize. We grow up being taught this. A lot of people in the mainstream don't want to play 5/10, three star or 75% rated games. Those are some of the most fun games games I've ever played, especially those that generate a wide variation in scores (and more importantly, opinions).

I like Gather Your Party. I am usually weary of any publication that calls themselves honest (I'll be the judge of that), but here's an example of some thought-provoking material.

http://www.gatheryourparty.com/artic...tive-in-games/

In the comments I suggested that video games don't necessarily need stories.

Last edited by Spokker; 09-10-2013 at 02:42 AM.
Spokker is offline   Reply With Quote