About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Fight Critic: MMA writers react emotionally, not rationally to steroid problem

Chi Kong Lui's picture

After testing positive for steroids in their match at UFC 73, both UFC lightweight champion Sean Sherk and his opponent Hermes Franca have been fined and suspended by the California State Athletic Commission. Since then, several prominent MMA writers decried that the sport is suffering from a steroid epidemic and adamantly suggested that UFC President Dana White take the following actions:

While each of the above writers undoubtedly cares a great deal about the well-being of the sport of MMA, all of the above suggestions are bit puzzling.

In regards to Mr. Sievert's suggestions, former heavyweight champions Josh Barnett and Tim Sylvia had their titles stripped after they tested positive for steroids (the latter was voluntary while the former wasn't). Yet this historical fact did little to deter Sean Sherk from doping if he did indeed do it (his appeal is pending). Increasing fines by incremental percentages doesn't really add that much more sting either. The penalty of not allowing a fighter to perform and earn is really where the damage to the wallet is done. I don't know about you, but if someone told me I wasn't allowed to earn any money for year, that would suck big time.

Mr. Iole's suggestion of more testing makes sense to a limited degree, but it's a lot like MP3 file sharing. Just because you make it harder doesn't mean that people will stop and just like file sharing, it's a constant technological race to stay one step ahead of system. There probably should be more testing regardless, but it won't clean up the sport and it needs to be done not by the UFC, but by an independent third-party.

As for Mr. Gross' suggestions, not only do I find them baffling, but I also am a bit disturbed by what he is proposing. What Mr. Gross is implying is that fighters are incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong, are incapable of following the law as dictated by our government and the UFC needs to act as their moral compass. Last time I checked, wasn't teaching someone right from wrong the responsibility of one's parents? Isn't punishment for breaking the law the job of police and our judicial system? What can Dana White do that is scarier than prison?

What also confuses me about Mr. Gross' comments is that don't we celebrate MMA fighters as being contrary to the thug stereotype. These are well-educated, well-spoken sportsmen who thrive in competition and can physically do things that most of us only dream of, but Mr. Gross is saying they need to be babysat by Dana White?

As for the testing system currently in place now, I know this will sound strange, but having fighters like Sherk and Franca getting busted is actually a good thing. If fighters at the highest levels are getting caught and punished, it lets us know that the system works and even champions like Tim Sylvia and Josh Barnett and legends like Royce Gracie aren't exempt. That is the strongest message you can send to the fighters that you are serious about trying to keep the sport as clean as possible.

The cold-hard reality is that there are no easy answers and it's a no-win situation for fighters. Just looking at Hermes Franca situation tells you the sort of enormously difficult life decisions he must make that not only affect his health, but also the financial well-being of his family. If he backs out of the fight, sure he can fight again another day with his reputation intact, but meanwhile he is still not making money and he can lose his valuable place in the pecking order. Just look at how long it took Georges St-Pierre and Karo Parisyan to get back into title contention. Unfortunately, it's a highly competitive and unforgiving business. It's unfair to the UFC to make guarantees because the show must go on, storylines continue to develop with or without the injured fighter and other fighters' livelihoods should not be put on hold to wait for another to heal.

I can understand that many writers and fans of the sport are upset and unnerved by the amount of failed steroid tests over the last year. But for anyone to suggest that there are easy solutions to this problem is disrespectful to the promoters, who embrace third-party testing by commissions to discourage doping, and to fighters who may need to make impossibly difficult decisions regarding the physical and financial health of their family that we should all pray that we never have to face.

Category Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This article is

This article is puzzling.

The two participants in the LW title fight both test positive for steroids and you seem to think there's nothing to be done; in fact, the only thing you've done is criticize anyone suggesting that it is a problem and that something should be done.

It is undeniable that when the two participants in a title fight both test positive, it's a problem for the sport on many fronts.

Stripping Sherk of the title makes sense, considering he won't be defending it for an entire year. They do it all the time in boxing, but your rebuke of Sievert's argument overlooks that well-known fact.

I'm all for more MMA coverage, but you should consider keeping your thoughts, especially when they add nothing to the dialog except noise, to yourself.

What I was saying is the

What I was saying is the Sievert's suggestion of stripping the belt is not new. It was already done in the past and it will probably be done again if Sherk guilty and more importantly, it won't deter anyone from taking steroids. Am I suggesting that it shouldn't be stripped. No, it should be stripped, but its not going to "clean up the sport" as the writers have implied. It doesn't address the heart of why the fighters do it. None of the ideas proposed make any sense and come off like knee-jerk reactions and don't give the promotors and fighters any credit.

Once again you have failed

Once again you have failed to address anything besides the opinions of others.

Does Sherk and Franca's use of steroids, knowing full well that all title fight participants are tested represent an underlying problem within UFC (and MMA in general) or are all these instances just pure, unrelated anomalies?

You criticize the use of punitive measures against fighters (or just these ideas?), are you suggesting the UFC take measures to solve the "root" of the problem instead of dealing in consequences? What is the root of the problem? What is wrong with the UFC having a code of conduct with its own punishments like the other sports leagues which require exclusive contracts (NBA, NFL, MLB)?

Please, suggest something. Anything. Until then, your thoughts on this subject are about as valuable as the 37th post in a Sherdog thread that reads: "Rickson by armbar".

I'm all for more testing as

I'm all for more testing as I said in my blog entry above. The issue here is that we have to be realistic about what can be accomplished and not do something stupid and drastic due to too emotion and hysteria regarding the topic. I don't think anyone is overreacting per say, but its getting close to it.

I also think that not enough reconition was given to the fact that the accused were caught and will be punished. As Forest Griffin said in a recent interview regarding steroids, he said that the penalities given to Bonnar convinced him to stay away from the stuff (mind you this is with the current system in place). How much punishment and how much more fines will convince others its not worth it? These are difficult questions and I don't envy the guy who will have to make them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.