About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Need for Speed: Most Wanted Review

Christopher Floyd's picture

Identity Crisis

Need for Speed: Most Wanted Screenshot

HIGH Blistering down a sunset highway at almost 200mph.

LOW Hurtling straight into a divider at almost 200mph.

WTF Where is the start menu?!

As someone raised firmly in the simulation racing stable, I was a touch dubious about Need for Speed: Most Wanted—arcade racers have always felt far too forgiving and chaotic to hold my interest. Criterion's latest effort seems to occupy a middle ground between both ends of the spectrum.

Racing through Most Wanted's city of Fairhaven is a joyous experience. Keen travelers will recognize familiar landmarks that bear more than a passing resemblance to locations in London, Paris, New York, and Boston, to name just a few. There is much to do and much to see, and so many billboards to hurtle through at high speeds.

All that hurtling will require cars, and the game boasts a vast range of vehicles. The sole caveat is that players must find them hidden throughout Fairhaven's environs. Once discovered, vehicles can be driven immediately, or chosen later at leisure. With the structure of play, it's unlikely that most people will drive everything they find since the campaign steers the player towards devoting time towards upgrading whichever cars suit their preference.

The competitive circuit and point-to-point races are traditional arcade rubber-banding with a slight simulation twist. It's definitely not a game that overlooks reckless driving, as most standard arcade racers will, and there's a focus on using good racing lines and cornering.

The game is totally unforgiving when it comes to its traffic system, though—expect to crash into a lot of NPC cars. For example, oncoming traffic will often turn in towards the player's car. This random implementation of traffic is totally counter to the game's semi-simulation focus, and why anybody would steer towards someone driving head-on at breakneck speeds is beyond me, but it's abundant in Most Wanted. This crashing, alongside the demanding cornering, will try even the hardiest level of patience.

Most Wanted's multiplayer takes an interesting twist from the standard point-to-point or circuit races, offering extra challenges such as "Who can drift the furthest?," or "As a group, collectively jump 1200 yards." These are interspersed with more traditional races and time trials, and are a refreshing way to play with the vast array of vehicles in an open-world game.

Need for Speed: Most Wanted Screenshot

Sometimes, however, the challenges can seem obtuse, ranging right up to nigh-on impossible. For example, when playing online as a team we were tasked to jump from one Fairhaven monument to another, and it was no mean feat. The level of challenge combined with a lack of coaching resulted in a long session of eight people driving aimlessly, waiting for the tournament round to finish.

This anecdote is evidentiary of the game's core issue: it doesn't seem able to choose between being an arcade racer, or a driving sim.The multiplayer confusion represents one facet of this, but these issues persist elsewhere, too.

The worst aspects of Most Wanted are the terrible navigation and waypointing systems—the game is crying out for some kind of GPS voiceover because at the speeds the vehicles reach, there's no time to look at the corner map for where to turn. Consequently, doing so often results in crashing, missing checkpoints, or otherwise invalidating the race and necessitating a restart. Of course, when playing online that option is gone. It's a matter of making one tiny mistake, and winning becomes a far-off dream.

Navigation problems extend beyond the driving. The lack of a manual or useful tutorial leaves it up to players to learn the game on their own, which is easier said than done in an open world driving game. Additionally, the pause menu is sluggish and slow to respond—a problem seen in previous Criterion racing games—and makes using it a trying experience.

As something of a replacement, Criterion offers a new in-game menu system, called EasyDrive, which is designed for use with the d-pad whilst playing. If my earlier comments concerning the difficulty of map consultation while driving are still fresh, similar difficulties apply to navigating a menu whilst driving. In an effort to counter this, Kinect functionality allows the EasyDrive menu to be navigated through voice commands, but with no game feedback, it's never clear if the highlighted option is where it needs to be without checking it. The important problem is looking at the menu, rather than using the controller to navigate it. In this sense, it has failed.

Need for Speed: Most Wanted is caught between two worlds. The game can't quite decide if it wants to be an arcade or a simulation racing game, and it takes a lot to get used to this in-between zone it occupies. That said, once the adjustment period is over, there is a lot of enjoyment to be had when it's not being frustrating. For players that find Forza too fussy and Burnout too casual, Most Wanted might be be the racing game of the holidays. Rating: 6.0 out of 10.

Disclosure: This game was obtained via the publisher and reviewed on the Xbox 360. Approximately 25 hours of play were devoted to the game. In single-player mode, the game's primary campaign was completed. The multiplayer mode was played, with approximately five hours dedicated to it.

Parents: According to the ESRB, this game contains alcohol references, comic mischief, and violence. The car crashes are shown in explicit detail, and while there is no blood or gore, there is a clear and present sense of risk and damage which may be disturbing to children. A core theme of the game is defying the law, and directly challenging and behaving aggressively towards law enforcement. This may be a concern for some parents.

Deaf & Hard of Hearing: The most important sound cues are hearing approaching police sirens, and the gear shifts in cars. If you find driving games to be unfettered by a hearing impairment, there is nothing of particular note in this title. All menus and game instructions are textual.

Category Tags
Platform(s): Xbox 360   Wii U   Vita   PS3   PC  
Developer(s): Criterion  
Publisher: Electronic Arts  
Series: Need for Speed  
Genre(s): Driving  
ESRB Rating: Everyone  
Articles: Game Reviews  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A few questions

Interesting take on the game, as I find it to be rather different than my experience. I played on PS3, and found that cars never went straight for me or actively turned towards me; all that they've focused on is staying straight in my playthrough. My crashing into them was always entirely my fault.

When you stated that the game is unforgiving in regards to the traffic system, it seemed like you were referring mainly to this issue, but what exactly were you expecting? If you are in an open world environment, you can't expect there to be no traffic, or for it to be so sparse that it would be negligible.

I don't feel as if the game truly forces you to stick with one car, considering you find an abundance of cars to change into, and fully upgrading a car might take about 45 minutes if you run into a lot of problems while racing. You're free to change and work with whatever you want, so the campaign steering the player is a bit of an overstatement in my opinion.

Would you really say the navigation is that terrible? I agree an alert system would be useful, but after the first few races the actual course itself becomes evident, making navigation only an issue while trying to find a race. Then your critique on this matter makes sense, but otherwise I could only accord that to a lack of attention payed to the courses offered.

I did not understand what was so difficult about learning how to play this game, however. All you had to do was tinker with the buttons to find out what they did, so the approximate minute spent doing this doesn't really reflect a poor design decision in my opinion.

I did not feel the pause menu to be slow or sluggish, so perhaps this is only a Xbox 360 problem.

I never felt that the game was at all confused about what it wanted to be, as it felt evident that it just wanted to be an arcade racing game. The myriad upgrade options aid in the driving, but they aren't so technical as to be off-putting. The entire thrill is on the racing and ability to have no pressure while having a joyride in a city at breakneck speeds, not customizing one's car and following racing protocols. The cops are difficult to go against and are the one point of real pressure this game offers, as other racers are generally simple to get rid of and take down.

I also found it strange that no mention of the Most Wanted races was made, as I found this to be one of the most enjoyable parts of the game. Trying to keep up with and take down one of the Most Wanted racers was exhilarating, with the caveat that if you did miss them the first time around, they tended to disappear far too easily.

If you could clarify anything on these issues, I would be grateful.

Great response

Hey there Blacksea,

That's interesting about having not experienced the same traffic-driving-into-you as I did whilst playing. It's not uncommon for there to be subtle differences across ports of games, whether in play styles or graphical appearances.

In your own description of the traffic as being logically there to slow players down/offer obstacles, and then your follow-up on the game as "The entire thrill is on the racing and ability to have no pressure while having a joyride in a city at breakneck speeds" is more or less what I mean when I describe the game as being unsure whether it wants to be an arcade or a simulation racer. It's odd to place (as I found too) so much focus on driving at super-fast speeds, only to pepper the courses with traffic obstacles and a map-navigation screen that barely serves its purpose at such speeds. Being unable to know when your required turn is coming up necessitates that the player learns each course by memory. Learning courses by memory in order to succeed is much more characteristic of simulation racing than of arcade racing. By and large, memorizing anything isn't a 'fun' experience, and fun is the core of arcade racing.

Besides that, I see that there are a few of my opinions on the game that you don't agree with, and that's great to see – while my views are considered valuable on these games, they are certainly not the be-all and end-all, nor the stopping point for consideration. If you found the things that I didn't enjoy to be more enjoyable, then it merely goes to show that the game will appeal to some people where it fails to appeal to others. It is for this reason that I closed by saying that it might do precisely this.

Thanks for lending an alternative view on your experiences. I hope you have a great time with playing the game!

Thanks for the clarification

I appreciate the time you put into this response, as it really makes clear what you considered to be the prevalent simulation aspect. I'm not sure what your experience has been with other Need for Speed games, but the ones I played (namely Hot Pursuit 2 on the PS2, Hot Pursuit and Shift on PS3) have had this traffic mechanic in the game. Perhaps it's the inclusion of too much traffic that made this game confused about its own nature, as I can definitely see a rise in the number of obstacles in general. I myself have also been frustrated by the sheer boost in number of civilian vehicles just waiting to ruin my race, so it does take away from the overall game. At the same time, without their inclusion the open world loses a lot of realism. Maybe a change in the number of actual vehicles when a race is started would have made the game more consistent with its goal?

The actual memorization of courses I feel is partly debatable. Just thinking of games like Mario Kart, in which the courses must also be memorized to be played effectively, does make the notion of memorization as simulation questionable. I don't know, since we can't really quantify the inverse relationship between memorization and fun, I can definitely see where this becomes subjective!

Thank you for a great review Christopher, I hope to see more of your work soon!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.