About Us | Game Reviews | Feature Articles | Podcast | Best Work | Forums | Shop | Review Game

Brink Review

Brandon Bales's picture

Me Shoot Now

Brink Screenshot

HIGH Seeing the credits roll came as a nice relief.

LOW Certain game-types can last fifteen agonizing minutes, regardless of the win conditions.

WTF "New Audio Log Unlocked!" AWESOME!!

In this day and age, first-person shooters litter the landscape like so much overripe fruit. While not every piece can be a delicious treat, one truly hates to discover a slightly spoiled interloper, especially knowing how much work it takes to bring it to market. Brink is one such game. Somewhere along the production line something went wrong in development, and the results lead to one sadly generic firefight.

Make no mistake, Brink works just fine.  Two opposing forces square off on the battlefield, blasting each other with a variety of guns while fulfilling various genre-standard gaming tropes: escort something, defend something, annihilate something, etc.  As a member of the Security or Resistance forces, you'll fight pitched battles for dominance of The Ark, a dying future-city once built to become a thriving utopia, and do so solely via multiplayer matches.  All in all, it works as well as any FPS would be expected to in this day and age....but that's about it.

Mediocrity is not something that sells games, of course, and the few hooks meant to set Brink apart from the rest are present: first, a striking visual aesthetic. Second, the inclusion of parkour (or free-running) into the player's moveset.  While initially intriguing, these elements seemed to be diminished in the end to make room for the standard mechanics of a multiplayer shooter—mechanics we've seen many times before.

It starts to go wrong the minute the game's story gets going. The Ark, a city built to house millions after global catastrophe has flooded most of the Earth, is being ripped apart by the civil strife between those keeping order and those wanting to leave in search of dry land. (Maybe no one watched Waterworld however many years ago?..) The interesting setup, however, would lead players to think that they might be getting into an epic tale of passion, reaction, and revenge!  The nature of the type of game that Splash Damage and Bethesda have made, however, is at complete odds with this idea.

Brink Screenshot

There is no traditional "single-player" component of Brink, and that's fine—it's just that a string of deathmatches makes it nigh-impossible to tell a cohesive story. They tried, bizarrely, with cinematics that bookend each mission, but these story bits are incomprehensible at best and downright silly at worst, little more than so many dudes yelling at each other about revenge and freedom. Couple this with the fact that both sides are meant to be morally equal, and the potential for a varying storyline disappears. Seriously, just giving this game a story was worse than giving it none. A simple narrative backdrop would have made it so much easier to polish the game's finer points that i mentioned earlier. These finer points, however, are bungled all the same.

I was initially drawn to the game's catchy visual style; its heroes are lanky, hyper-extended, and almost cartoony.  This was done perhaps to provide a visual coupling with the parkour elements of the game. As stated before, however, a striking style means bupkis when all the characters become interchangeable, shouty soliloquizers. Oh yeah, where are all the women, for that matter?

So, what about the parkour—debatably the game's biggest selling point? I'm sad to say that its use never feels like a real game-changer. While it works in ways similar to Ubisoft's Mirror's Edge (a game from which it borrows a few style points as well), the urban movement fails to make itself an essential part of play. Players can use it to get from one place to the next, or to scale obstacles for a slight advantage, but the nature of Brink never lends itself to hasty getaways or climbing high above the field to achieve certain objectives. You've got guns to shoot; parkour only ever registers as an afterthought. Honestly, it just doesn't mesh well to this type of structure. The thrills of free-running are more in line with stealth and adventure than they are with unloading machine guns and explosives on the way to victory.

Though the game fails to capitalize on its main conventions, the shooting here works reasonably well.  Players will have a variety of guns to choose from, though most aren't too dissimilar.  Experience points will earn players new weapons and options based on their favorites of the game's four classes. There are dozens of upgrades for each class, spanning FPS conventions such as quicker reload times, extra health, or different grenade types. In effect, upgrading the different classes ends up being the real selling point of the game, and gamers who dig these sorts of upgrade-potential will get the most out of Brink. It struck me as pretty hollow, however, to see countless unlocks awaiting the player while the basic game mechanics offered so few compelling twists on old formulas.  It boils down to something like a big FPS piñata cracked open and spilled onto the floor.

Speaking of old formulas, the two main games that Brink borrows from, Team Fortress 2 and Mirror's Edge are both superior efforts. While one may find more human players Brinking it than playing Team Fortress 2 when booting up their 360 or PS3, they won't find the same level of variety or polish.  And while there's a lot more shooting in Brink than in Mirror's Edge, there's certainly less thrills and pacing. Brink works fine, yes, and can deliver a competent multiplayer game of shoot-shoot, but as a full-priced retail title it leaves a lot to be desired. A simple, story-less downloadable game would have made much more sense. Of course in that case, there'd be a lot less voiceover shouting... Rating: 4.0 out of 10.

Disclosures: This game was obtained via publisher and reviewed on the Xbox 360. Approximately twelve hours of play was devoted to the single and multiplayer modes, though they are the same.

Parents: According to the ESRB, this game contains: blood, language and violence. There's nothing too grisly for parents to be concerned about here.  Standard depictions of shooting deaths occur time and again, but it's nothing out of the gaming ordinary.

Deaf & Hard of Hearing: You are completely out of luck with this one since the game features absolutely zero subtitles. There's not too much that would really be missed from the threadbare story, but it's a pretty glaring omission considering the MASSIVE introductory tutorial shares a wealth of vital information through audio only. In addition, many in-game dialog lines refer to actions taking place in-game, so those would also be missed. The complete lack of subtitles is pretty shameful.

Category Tags
Platform(s): Xbox 360   PS3   PC  
Developer(s): Splash Damage  
Publisher: Bethesda  
Series: Brink  
Genre(s): Shooting   Online/Multiplayer  
ESRB Rating: Teen (13+)  
Articles: Game Reviews  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well, I completely disagree

Well, I completely disagree with this review. After playing Brink I feel that my movement is awfully restricted in other men-with-gun-games. It's no mirrors edge 2, of course, but the parcour element works fine, but does not try to steal the show.

Everything I hate about other online men-with-gun-games is not an issue here. When I play Call of Duty I get destroyed within milliseconds by children questioning my sexuality. In Brink I'm still no FPS-god but can do something useful for my team and what I did in the singleplayer is not invalid in the online world. I like that there is no 'killcam', no list of who died the most and other statistics that make me feel bad about myself. Brink likes me, while Call of Duty laughs at me, slapping statistics about my awfulness in my face. I like Brink.

Also, it has colors other than brown and greenish-brown. It is genuinely colorful. Brink is not a semi-realistic military shooter and does not contain monosyllabic space marines. Weapons are loud, crude and fun to use. Above all it is a lot of fun to play online for someone like me, who never had much fun playing men-with-gun games online.

Li-Ion, I agree with you


I agree with you regarding the state of certain multiplayer shooter player behaviors - nothing is worse than being owned and getting shit for it. Brink is friendlier in that sense, for sure. I feel, though, that it might be more abusive in Brink were the game simply more appealing to the average shooter player. I'm guessing that the more people flock to a game, the higher the asshole potential. It's also certainly true in Brink that individual stats take a backseat to the team's overall victory, which is indeed nice. I can't remember, however, if you can even see those stats at all... Can you?

You're right, too, about it being colorful. That's definitely appreciated.

Oh, yeah: the parkour. While I agree with you that they don't try to steal the show, I feel like they don't make the sort of impression that necessitates their being in the game. They belong in a game that relies on their use. Brink could have been done without it - at least, the game that shipped. ( I feel like the whole idea of the game changed somewhere in development. )

Like I said, Brink works fine, and was fun for me in small doses, but it's certainly a case of "your mileage may vary."

Brink - PC Perspective

Having played the game on PC, here are some sights & sounds from a PC perspective and keeping in mind that Brink is a game I wanted to love so much.

[Pre-ordered on Steam. How I wish I haven't.]

1. Unfinished/broken/unpolished game.

2. Serious issue/incompatibility/unoptimized with ATI Cards. (How could this happen in 2011?) (FYI, I own a 5870 HD)

3. Patches/ATI Hot fixes/Anything => Game still suffers considerably when it comes to frame rates, having sharp FPS decreases and increases for no reason. Engine feels unfinished.
(Mind you the system running it played Crysis 2 & Bulletstorm at 1080p high fidelity without any significant problem)

4. Gameplay => shooting is average but doesn't feel as tight as it should be. Recoil is sometimes absent.
S.M.A.R.T system is interesting but not ground breaking as it should have been. Ironically basic running/sprinting feels awkward.

And as Brad said as well as others offline gameplay is dull. It can be interesting for online coop only. Hence no need to mention the nightmare when it comes to online play: lag, sound issue, matchmaking, graphical bugs, players disappearing etc.

Simply put, the game feels unfinished on PC and the concept doesn't even shine. And as an FPS, shooting doesn't feel that 'right'.

I had the chance to re-invest a couple of hours lately since the game received many patches and fixes in the last 2-3 weeks and became playable but still the game itself is forgettable. Objectives, classes, parkour, shooting etc. everything is simply forgettable.

In addition the PC community has been shrinking with barely almost nobody to play with these days online.

So much hype, so much noise, so much style..
Shame, the game couldn't follow..


As a whole, I think Brink

As a whole, I think Brink does indeed lack deepness when it comes to the parkour. Climbing (higher then a maximum of 2 jumps in light body) should have existed to make it WAY less linear. I mean many path are a must to move faster, yet does not frequently make a massive change in a game. Due to this fact, it's not surprising to always see a turret at the same spot, mines at the same choke points etc. I absolutly love this game and I highly disagree with the lack of clarity of the story. I even find it rather deep for a multiplayer-axed fps (opposing it to CS, TF2...). Of course, you need to work your way to the audio logs (wich are a quite nice addition to the game, imo) and to listen the maps intro if you want some deepness. I also think that the side missions lack utility, as they never changethe outcome of the game. They do open side path's, give you an extra exp, but it still lack any real utility like changing the next objective or just opening a new way to win the game in any way. The skills are nice and well balanced, yet explosives are very underpowered compared to anything sligthly realistic (grenades does not kill most ennemy, but still knocks them down, and deal some good damage). So the bottom line for me is : its a pretty cool game, maybe too expensive, and even if it lacks this little something special, I feel that if they are to make a Brink 2, they are not that far from what players who bought Brink were looking for, only some tweeking on maps and more liberty of movements is needed.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Code of Conduct

Comments are subject to approval/deletion based on the following criteria:
1) Treat all users with respect.
2) Post with an open-mind.
3) Do not insult and/or harass users.
4) Do not incite flame wars.
5) Do not troll and/or feed the trolls.
6) No excessive whining and/or complaining.

Please report any offensive posts here.

For more video game discussion with the our online community, become a member of our forum.

Our Game Review Philosophy and Ratings Explanations.

About Us | Privacy Policy | Review Game | Contact Us | Twitter | Facebook |  RSS
Copyright 1999–2016 GameCritics.com. All rights reserved.